Airetl Landphone Dirextory

fold CUPERTINO

Both the IPAD. It was the IPAD. And Styahweh Jobs saw that it was good and right.

E 'was born, finally. Some say he was born dead. Others say with enthusiasm that this is a revolution unparalleled in the field of multimedia. In short, the usual Steve Jobs (the god-genius-owner of Apple), which, surrounded by a halo tacking to the blue, to the applause of a well-organized claque representatives of the so-called "press" (But not only that), presented on the stage of the Yerba Buena Center in San Francisco, California in the heart of schwarzeneggeriana, the IPAD summa universe of e-technology multi-tasking-touching-searching -playing and so on. Put everything that makes computer and you have an idea of \u200b\u200bconsumption substantially exact characteristics of the next object of desire of millions of virtual Saving Silverman but not limited to teenagers. As always happens in this sector, the world is divided. "It will be as epoch-making" ; "It will be disastrous iflop" . There is no middle ground. Bipolar global computer. But

stevejobsiano the IPAD is really a futuristic tool intended to supplant in stroke notebook, netbook, ebook, iphone, ipod, GPS, and signing off? The earliest records speak of a sort of container, with cutting edge features electronic handyman able to dive into a computer the empyrean of ecstasy "lucky owners" of the magical instrument. I quote from a website specialized ( www.wintricks.it ):

The iPad also has an accelerometer, digital compass, microphone, speaker, Bluetooth 2.1 connectivity and can connect to the Internet via Wi-Fi. IPad can run applications previously developed for iPod Touch and iPhone, even at full screen.

Holy shit! It 's a bomb. But we do not know whether it can also produce tea, coffee, cappuccino and hot chocolate with whipped cream. In return you

browse the Internet and check e-mails, view photos and videos, listen to music, see and play digital maps.

Figo! Workers at the (almost former) Fiat Termini Imerese will queue up to grab one at a modest price (base model) of almost $ 500, about € 360. Mica very little but want to make a tool that does the future like a beast and weighs only 670 grams, is about 30 cm long and 20 wide and has a multi touch screen with a diagonal of 9.7 inches (sorry: inches; appreciate the precision multilingual or not?) and a thickness of only 1.3 cm. level playing field require adequate conversion: about 0.5 inches. Or, if you prefer, ring 0.7 or 0.6 average. A conversion algorithm cm - toes has not been implemented yet. But Steve Jobs has revealed that, in collaboration with researchers at MIT, he is planning to enter one of the software packages available in the next version dell'iPad to be called, for the occasion, ibigtoe . Or ihandjobs if jeromonaci Cupertino able to implement the functions of IPAD also suite to make sex safe and guaranteed.

But the real and shocking news of the baby monster (or monster?) Of Cupertino, Silicon Valley, about an aspect totally unexpected: the iPad will allow you to browse through newspapers and books: The news, as you can see, is a real bomb. Just licking fingers to move from page to page. Just hysterical in case of loss of favorite bookmarks. Enough, especially with that exhausting exercise on the crowded subway, in a vain attempt to open and view our favorite newspaper. E ' sufficient to pay € 360 and you're done. Bruising under the eyes of envy of other passengers, displaying superior indifference with our e-newspaper format tablet being now the tabloid archaeological outdated and impractical late romantic. Of course we will adapt to the novelty of the instrument and avoid wetting the index in the totti attempt to browse the IPAD, notoriously devoid of paper. But after the first few days will not be a problem: we will succeed. And finally we will be happy. Along with Jobs. And book publishers and newspapers will be unhappy. Forever.

Transport Truck In Gta San Andreas

THE rejection of mouth and Buridan's ass if the veil

There 's been like everyone (except D'Alema) they expected. Vendola happens triumphantly to himself. He does so to great acclaim with a Bulgarian majority. 73% of the votes with which the outgoing governor of Puglia wins the primaries against Dalem Boccia, it is more enlightening. For a variety of reasons, some of which are working against a politically correct assessment of the PD and the future of the Italian center-left. Or if you prefer the left-center: the reversal of the terms does not seem significant or the presence or absence of the hyphen. First, it confirms

, pace the critics, that the system of primaries, in addition to being powerful tool of democracy inside, it really works. The second nomination of Vendola is proof beyond doubt. Although, obviously, the outcome of the electoral March, in Puglia, is far from obvious.

Then because the results come out of the "polls" clarify once and for all that, once again, Massimo D'Alema has taken a decision that the results, only those that count in a competition of any kind, have been shown to be completely wrong . On the merits, because the "political figure" in the context of primary Vendola was, for those unwilling to stubbornly close both eyes, absolutely unassailable. In the method, because scriteriatamente fight openly and against an opponent (this is D'Alema Vendola even if the litigant was formally Boccia) under clear numerical inferiority and, above politics, is always a serious mistake. Often give up the fight (not to fight) is a sign of good sense, foresight and awareness of its limitations. Who does not know to do is doomed to defeat. Land, the latter, whose dust pidiessino the "king of Apulia, and experienced great losers, knows quite well since the ancient times of the unfortunate experience bicameralism. To this he said: "The large victory Vendola confirms the link of the President of our region with much of the electorate of the center, including the voters of the Democratic Party.'' C'est à say that I admire less the intelligence Policy d'Alema that his intelligence. But maybe I missed something.

Tertium, but not least, the facts of Puglia once again bring out the structural problems of a political force (called the Democratic Party "party" is reckless pursuit of accuracy and nostalgia onomastics), completely and perhaps permanently tethered in an inextricable network of opposing powers, juxtapositions of intestine, and counter-thrusts intended to render impossible any policy of alliances, any agriculture policies tout court and ungovernable the "political entity". That is to say almost the entire left. Politics is, mutatis mutandis, as a permanent state of war. Each of the strategies, tactics, troops, army, officers. Even alliances, of course. But D'Alema, contrary to what Stalin did to the Pope, he had never asked how many divisions Vendola? A team (political or military) in whose core thrive too many colonels, generals and chiefs of staff, sooner or later falls into paralysis. And ridiculous. About the divisions would not be appropriate to talk seriously even those present (in the arithmetic sense) in the Democratic Party?

weighs on everything, finally, the problem alliances, which apparently is just another issue since the abandonment of Vendola by mouth and, ultimately, a matter of choice of companions. Just as the decision to establish alliances with the occasional Casini's UDC (and walk) but also of Salvatore Cuffaro, who was sentenced in recent days to seven years on appeal for having fostered a mob boss. Will, once again, Senator udc indigestion of cannoli to celebrate the conviction as if it were an absolution? To point out the not insignificant fact that the Court of Appeal of Palermo has reformed the decision at first instance, bringing condemnation from 5 to 7 years.

Actually, it was, that of Pd, a miopissima improvident and choice than ever. You can not clamor for the moralization of public life, the expulsion from the electoral lists of all offenders, strict reporting of collusion between crime and politics, only to come to terms, even locally, with a party in whose ranks Cuffaro , former governor of Sicily, he still holds an important role.

But, one could argue, even in the presumption of innocence of the policy is valid until the final ruling. Very true. But we're talking, of course, policy in this sphere and the much-invoked reasons of expediency, if you do not want to disturb values \u200b\u200bsuch as honesty and moral rectitude, must be kept in very large account. This, in the case of electoral alliances with the UDC, the Democratic Party has not done so. We are companions of snacks to a "presumed" (prudence is never enough: there is still a degree of trial) abetting the Mafia. For the bargain the Local Casino continues to defend Cuffaro and "put his hand on fire" (to quote sensum).

The UDC secretary remembers Porsenna. We also invite his companion to the Bersani browse Wikipedia to refresh your memory on the gesture (quite conscious, in that case) lucumone of Chiusi, which is between history and legend, but that could turn into a very current political news story.

Meanwhile Umbria in the game to the massacre inside the Democratic Party is likely to recur. former treasurer of the party Bersani, Mauro Agostini, still clinging to her candidacy in the event of primary, as opposed to the outgoing governor Rita Lorenzetti. To save both ways are thought to mediate with the regional secretary pd Lanfranco Bottini. What will the Democratic Party? Remember Buridan's ass which starved to death for not being able to decide between two, from which bale of hay to eat? There. In Umbria, the situation is even more complicated because the "ball" are three. Eventuality that even Leibniz, treating the problem of causal determinism in the "S agios of theodicy" , had taken into account. Do you really need me to tell you how it will end?

Is There Any Treatment For Kidneys

BANDANA

The case, yet another in this matter, as it has exploded with low noise. "Someone" has prevented Fatima, a student of 13 years of Palestinian origin, to read his speech to President Napolitano during the visit of head of state in Reggio Calabria. An obstacle (even this legitimate?) Resulting from the veil that the girl, the Muslim family, would have worn during the reading of a text prepared for days, with meticulous effort. "Someone" has telephoned the Statues on the journey from Reggio C. to "suggest" to remove the hijab while reading his speech in front of Napolitano. Which, incidentally, has still received and heard. (pictured)

The story, indeed the record, it's all here. Certainly not cheap. Back to manifest that fear of the unknown (of 'the other call it what you will) that accompanies man from its earliest origins. This is one of those human characteristics that define René Girard "... hidden from the foundation of the world." And suddenly, but not entirely unexpected, burst to the surface and are revealed bursting with immediacy. Prove, in fact. Reveal, "King veil." Show? Or again, conceal, cover up? or concealment demonstration? The language, this is the truth, is ambiguous at least as human thought.

misunderstanding which is underlined even looking lexical item. They call all veil. But not everyone agrees on the meaning of the term. Many also include under this name hijab, burka and niqab, which leaves uncovered only the habit nun eyes. In short, veil, headscarf, hijab, burka or niqab, always stone of the scandal it is.

But look at the picture that illustrates this paper. A face of pure young woman framed by a decorative cloth, to cover the head and shoulders. We prefer to call it f oulard , a French word. No, say the purists incidents in which angry captive-Judeo-Christian-Po, is an Islamic veil. Therefore to abolish and prohibit at least in public places. In private, if not the nose peeking through the keyhole, even if they can make.

E 'only (and not cheap), yet others say, yet another sign of submission macho element female widespread in the Islamic world. Ergo should be abolished. Also because the Koran does not prescribe. So religion has nothing to do. It is not entirely true but a bit short 'approximation can be used. Especially the ignorant. Who can read and write (no need to even know how to do arithmetic) to browse the Koran XXIV Sura An-Nur (The Light) 30-31

'And' the believing women to lower their gaze and be caste and not showing, their ornaments except what appears, to let down the veil from their chest. "

Then the Koran and the religion that is based on it, got to do or not? The answer inevitable is a resounding boh! too cryptic for that "... but what is" shuffles a deck of cards already very messy. If we show what is not clear what should be covered. Pardon, veil. Unless that "what seems" means something else. We go into the ground so muddy textual exegesis and interpretation. In fact, there are those who translated the verses are criminalized in this way

"... tell the believing women that lower the gaze and guard their shame and their parts do not show too fine, except what is outside, and covering her breasts with a veil and not to show their beautiful parts other than their husbands or their fathers or their sons or their in-laws ... '.

a test in which some might find a suggestive invitation to incest or otherwise interparentali. Invitation that is also present in the above quotation, and I have omitted only for the sake of brevity. On this point, the translations are unanimous.

According to the second translation, however, "what seems" could be sinuses, these are to be covered. So why hide the head and face? The Secretary of Muhammad did not written. How? Would not you know? The Koran did not write it seems that Muhammad could not read or write (even on this there are no certainties, only more or less reasonable assumptions). It seems that the text was composed in 632 AD, some 20 years after the death of the Prophet, Zaid ibn Thabit by his secretary at the request of the Caliph Othman. But even in this case there are no certainties.

A fine mess. But Catholics are accustomed to other exegetical backflips on sacred texts. A Mess for once at least not only "Italian". In France, the very homeland of the Marseillaise, the Revolutionary Enlightenment motto "liberty, Egalité, Fraternité , are made worse off because the scarf (this time the French forces) is prohibited in all public primary and secondary schools. The prohibition is not limited to the Islamic headscarf, but also deals with Christian crosses a certain size (you need to arm themselves with the ruler and / or arms to enforce the law) the Jewish yarmulke, the Sikh turban and, with supreme contempt of ridicule, as he explained the education minister Luc Ferry in office at the time of entry into force of Law (2004), "some hairy (sic), ie the honor of the chin (beard) where is grown according to certain rules of Muslim law. By the beard of the Prophet, is not all that ridiculous? No, it's grotesque.

the face of such controversy crucifix dispute even so, no crucifix that has delighted a few weeks ago, appears to be a noble argument, even if quodlibetale. I have a suggestion: ban in public places, along with veils, the chador, burka aut the like, the use of the bandana that you show "only what is ..." . A beautiful and shiny square. The rule, strict, rigorous, would operate in derogation of any immunity even for the highest offices of State nature and would be retroactive. Just as the law on the process soon. Of course, without bargaining.