E 'appeared on the site Altroconsumo (and on the unit it is spoken today), a bill whose origin is one of the most profound and disturbing mysteries that trouble our country. The case concerns in particular the introduction of a working tool of censorship on the dissemination of ideas, opinions and material on the Internet.
The first mystery relates to the authorship of the bill, which came into possession Altroconsumo and is circulated within the newly-created technical committee against piracy and digital media "press conference during the inauguration of January 14 last year. An organism, so to speak, which should ensure compliance with copyright on the web, topic so hot and he has done and will spill rivers of ink and bits. The problem stems from the fact that the authorship of the above-named proposal remains mysterious. And all denied. First by SIAE which states: "... the Italian Society of Authors and Publishers denies that the text of the proposal, this bill is to be given. SIAE plays a supporting role and cooperation within the "Technical Committee against piracy and digital media", the only member body to draw up a possible bill. "
Excluding that it's an immaculate conception so many wonderful, it would be interesting to discover the source of a text whose content includes an indication freedom-never looking anything else that art. 3, subsection 1, paragraph "i" states that "... Attribution supervisory powers to the government authorities and the police for the preservation of such telematics platforms for compliance with mandatory rules, public order, morality , including the protection of minors . "
clear? Steps for the protection of minors. But, to quote the former manipulitore of Montenero di Bisaccia, guesses that digital piracy with public order and morality? Also a concern, not only Altroconsumo, contained in a statement. 3 of that proposal to confer powers of control in matters of morality even to law enforcement. May confer or recognize any means to police, carabinieri and yellow flames, border police, traffic wardens, traffic aids and night watchman powers and ability to assess the morality and wider moral sphere? And what kind of power? Partially or totally self-sufficient? Rampant here, the obvious stench of unclean and dangerous temptation of censorship. So much so that the reference to the pedophilia is mere pretext, is actually good last quote in the body of the paragraph in question. How could also and how the publication of material by electronic means, whatever it is, be prejudicial to the public policy? Facebook hosts and keep the enthusiasm of hundreds of fans of Riina and Provenzano. Yet despite the enormity of the fact, we have news of riots, uprisings, riots in the streets, road blocks or attacks on barracks. The reference
categorical, finally, incorruptible "mandatory rules" reveals a deeply nostalgic and certainly use a typical modus legiferandi from someone who for now remains in the shadows. Worry because Manzoni he (or they)
"... a risen people / can be split into vulgar despised, and back the years and fates, / Push to prisci grief."
Silence! The enemy is listening.
0 comments:
Post a Comment